For the 2026 Super Bowl LX, Turning Point USA moved forward with its plan to host a rival halftime event, positioning it as an alternative to the NFL’s official show headlined by Bad Bunny.
But just days before kickoff, the organization issued an update that changed how some viewers would be able to tune in.
Background: Why the Alternative Show?
TPUSA announced “The All-American Halftime Show” as a cultural counterprogramming effort. Supporters framed it as a celebration of “faith, family, and freedom,” while critics viewed it as a politically motivated response to the NFL’s selection of Bad Bunny, whose performance has sparked cultural and ideological debate.
The alternative event featured a lineup of country and rock performers, including:
-
Kid Rock (headliner)
-
Brantley Gilbert
-
Lee Brice
-
Gabby Barrett
The livestream was scheduled to run simultaneously with the official halftime performance.
Leadership Changes at TPUSA
TPUSA was founded in 2012 by conservative activist Charlie Kirk, who led the organization until his death in September 2025. Following his passing, the board appointed his widow, Erika Kirk, as CEO and chair.
Under new leadership, the organization has continued to position itself prominently in cultural and political conversations—including high-visibility events like the Super Bowl.
Streaming Update: X Is Out, YouTube Is In
Shortly before the game, TPUSA posted an update on X (formerly Twitter), stating:
“UPDATE: Due to licensing restrictions, we are unable to stream The All-American Halftime Show on X.”
The post directed viewers instead to the organization’s YouTube channel, noting that the full show would be available there around 8PM ET.
For audiences who were expecting to watch directly on X, the shift required a last-minute adjustment.
Online Reaction
The update itself quickly became a talking point.
Some supporters expressed frustration over the logistics. A number of users commented that a direct YouTube link should have been included in the announcement to make sharing easier. Others criticized what they perceived as a lack of preparation, suggesting licensing details should have been finalized earlier.
Comments ranged from mild irritation—“Need to make this easy for folks”—to sharper criticism questioning event planning.
At the same time, many supporters remained enthusiastic about the lineup and message behind the show, indicating they would tune in regardless of platform changes.
A Broader Cultural Moment
This year’s Super Bowl halftime programming—both official and alternative—highlighted the way major entertainment events increasingly intersect with politics and cultural identity.
For TPUSA and its audience, the alternative show represented an attempt to offer a different aesthetic and ideological tone. For critics, it reflected ongoing polarization around music, language, and representation.
The licensing update may have complicated the rollout slightly, but it did little to dampen the broader conversation surrounding competing halftime experiences.
What do you think—was this simply a technical hiccup, or does it reflect something larger about how events like this are organized?