President Trump accused of ‘cruel and petty’ move following executive order: ‘It’s an attack on the truth’

President Donald Trump’s recent executive order has ignited a firestorm of criticism and protests, particularly concerning its impact on the Stonewall National Monument in New York City. This monument, established in 2016 by President Barack Obama, commemorates the 1969 Stonewall Uprising—a pivotal event in the LGBTQ+ rights movement. The executive order mandates that all federal agencies recognize only two genders, male and female, leading to the removal of references to transgender and queer individuals from the monument’s official website. This action has been widely condemned as an attempt to erase the significant contributions of transgender individuals to the LGBTQ+ rights movement.

Background of the Executive Order

On January 20, 2025, President Trump signed Executive Order 14168, titled “Defining Sex-Based Rights Under Law.” This order directs federal agencies to adopt a strict binary definition of sex, effectively excluding recognition of transgender and non-binary identities. The order also requires the removal of materials that “promote gender ideology” from federal resources and halts funding for programs supporting gender diversity. The administration asserts that this move aims to “restore biological truth to the federal government.”

Impact on the Stonewall National Monument

In compliance with Executive Order 14168, the National Park Service (NPS) revised the Stonewall National Monument’s official website. Previously, the site acknowledged the monument’s significance in the struggle for lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer (LGBTQ+) rights. The updated version, however, omits references to transgender and queer individuals, reducing the acronym to “LGB.” The revised text states: “Before the 1960s, almost everything about living openly as a lesbian, gay, or bisexual (LGB) person was illegal. The Stonewall Uprising on June 28, 1969, is a milestone in the quest for LGB civil rights and provided momentum for a movement.”

Public Outcry and Protests

The alterations to the monument’s website have sparked widespread outrage among LGBTQ+ advocates, historians, and public officials. Critics argue that this action not only distorts the historical narrative of the Stonewall Uprising but also marginalizes the transgender individuals who were instrumental in the movement.

New York Governor Kathy Hochul described the changes as “cruel and petty,” emphasizing that transgender people played a critical role in the fight for LGBTQ+ rights and that New York will not allow their contributions to be erased. Congressman Jerrold Nadler, whose district includes the Stonewall Inn, stated: “It’s an attack on the truth, it’s an attack on the transgender community, and it’s an attack on the very values of justice and equality that we as a nation claim to uphold.”

In response to the website changes, protests erupted outside the Stonewall National Monument. Demonstrators expressed their anger and disbelief, highlighting the essential role of transgender individuals in the LGBTQ+ rights movement. E. Garcia, a protester, remarked: “You can’t erase trans people, especially with Stonewall, and that’s the attempt that’s trying to be made when trans people were the ones that started the riot.” Another demonstrator, Meghan, called the move a “slap in the face,” adding: “If the queer community hadn’t been available to me, I wouldn’t be available right now.”

Broader Implications and Legal Challenges

The executive order affecting the Stonewall National Monument is part of a series of actions by the Trump administration targeting transgender rights. These include banning transgender women from participating in women’s sports, moving transgender female prisoners to male prisons, rolling back protections for transgender military service members, and removing transgender-specific health information from government websites.

These policies have faced legal challenges on multiple fronts. Civil rights groups argue that the executive orders violate constitutional protections and have filed lawsuits seeking to block their implementation. For instance, federal judges have temporarily halted orders restricting gender-affirming care for transgender youth, citing potential violations of equal rights and the separation of powers.

Historical Significance of the Stonewall Uprising

The Stonewall Uprising of 1969 is widely regarded as a catalyst for the modern LGBTQ+ rights movement. The riots began on June 28, 1969, following a police raid at the Stonewall Inn, a gay bar in Manhattan’s Greenwich Village. The raid sparked spontaneous protests and clashes with law enforcement, led by a diverse group of LGBTQ+ individuals, including transgender women of color such as Marsha P. Johnson and Sylvia Rivera. Their courageous actions galvanized a nationwide movement advocating for LGBTQ+ rights and acceptance.

Conclusion

The removal of transgender references from the Stonewall National Monument’s website has ignited a significant backlash, with critics condemning the move as an attempt to erase the contributions of transgender individuals from LGBTQ+ history. As legal challenges to the executive order proceed, the controversy underscores the ongoing struggle for transgender rights and recognition in the United States.

Related Posts

I Heard My Husband Say Another Woman’s Name in His Sleep for Three Weeks – So I Made the Call He Never Expected

For three weeks, my husband came home late, collapsed into bed without a word, and whispered another woman’s name into the dark. At first, I told myself…

Delivery driver held in custody over Nancy Guthrie disappearance breaks silence – confirms rumors

A delivery driver who was detained and questioned in connection with the disappearance of 84-year-old Nancy Guthrie has been released without charges. Carlos Palazuelos, 36, was reportedly…

My Husband Was Supposed to Watch Our Daughter While I Worked – but I Found Out He’d Been Dropping Her Off with the Neighbors for Weeks

I thought I had a childcare problem. Turns out, I had a trust problem. I’m Karen, 32. My husband Ben is 34. Our daughter Melissa is three,…

Woman Testifies About Suspect in Nancy Guthrie Case – He Is Her Son-in-Law

A normally quiet neighborhood in Rio Rico, Arizona, became the center of national attention this week after law enforcement descended on a modest home during the ongoing…

Nancy Guthrie suspect made one ‘rookie’ mistake on night of kidnapping, expert says

Major developments have emerged in the disappearance of 84-year-old Nancy Guthrie, as investigators intensify efforts to locate her and identify the person seen in newly released surveillance…

Canada rocked by the deadliest school shooting in 40 years as a ‘woman in a dress’ opens fire

Canada is mourning after a devastating shooting in Tumbler Ridge, British Columbia, where nine people were killed and at least 25 others injured in what authorities describe…