The disappearance of 84-year-old Nancy Guthrie continues to hold the nation’s attention — especially after multiple ransom notes surfaced demanding $6 million for her return.

But now, a former senior FBI official is questioning whether this case fits the profile of a kidnapping at all.

The frantic search for Nancy, the missing mother of “Today” co-anchor Savannah Guthrie, has entered its fourteenth day. Investigators were seen setting up a tent outside the Tucson-area crime scene early Thursday morning — just hours after Savannah shared an emotional video pleading for her mother’s safe return.

Authorities have canvassed the neighborhood and asked residents to hand over any home surveillance footage that might assist the investigation. Arizona officials say they’ve now received nearly 20,000 tips connected to the disappearance of the 84-year-old grandmother.

Amid the growing urgency, a new and troubling development emerged: a third ransom note, reportedly sent to TMZ. In the message, the sender claimed they were “not being taken seriously,” raising fresh questions about who is behind the communication — and whether it is credible.

Former FBI Assistant Director Chris Swecker says he is deeply skeptical.

“I just don’t think anything TMZ has brought forward has panned out,” Swecker said during an appearance on Fox News’ The Faulkner Focus. He suggested that such public platforms can become vehicles for opportunists. “It’s a good vehicle for people to come in and do this. TMZ gets some viewership, and it sort of ties up the investigative team trying to run this down. But I sense a scam here.”

Swecker was careful to add that he could be mistaken. “I may be absolutely wrong,” he acknowledged. “But bottom line, I’m very skeptical of it.”

His doubts go beyond the ransom letters themselves. In recent days, Swecker has openly questioned whether the case resembles a traditional kidnapping-for-ransom scenario at all.

“I’m very skeptical of this,” he told Fox News. “Is this really a kidnapping? Does somebody really have her, and is she really alive?”

According to Swecker, most kidnappers seeking ransom move quickly to establish credibility. They typically provide clear, verifiable proof of life — such as a current photo, video, or audio recording — to ensure payment.

“If this was a kidnapping, it would be a very simple matter to authenticate and provide proof of life,” he explained, noting that no confirmed image or recording has been released publicly to validate the claims.

That absence has fueled speculation that the Guthrie family may be dealing with opportunists rather than a coordinated abduction.

“I really think there’s a third party here that’s just playing with them,” Swecker said, suggesting that scammers could be exploiting the high-profile nature of the case.

Meanwhile, the emotional toll on the family is evident. Savannah Guthrie and her relatives have publicly acknowledged the ransom demands and signaled they are prepared to comply if it means bringing Nancy home safely. The family’s desperation has been palpable, with Savannah directly appealing to the suspected abductor in recent statements.

Authorities have intensified their efforts. The reward for information leading to an arrest has now doubled to $100,000. The FBI’s Phoenix division also announced that a forensic review of doorbell camera footage conducted by its Operational Technology Division uncovered new “identifying details” about the potential suspect.

Officials describe the individual seen in the footage as a man standing approximately 5 feet 9 inches to 5 feet 10 inches tall, with an average build. Investigators have also identified the backpack worn by the suspect: a black, 25-liter “Ozark Trail Hiker Pack.”

The evolving details — from ransom notes to surveillance analysis — have only added layers of complexity to an already unsettling case.

Whether this is a carefully orchestrated kidnapping, a cruel hoax, or something else entirely remains unclear. But one thing is certain: as days pass without confirmed proof of Nancy Guthrie’s condition, uncertainty continues to deepen — and the questions grow louder than the answers.