A private Signal group’s leaked messages have cast doubt on Donald Trump’s leadership credibility, sending him and his inner circle into a whirlpool of controversy.

But does the president also face other threats?

Less than 100 days after his return to the White House, Donald Trump’s administration’s stability is already being questioned.

Veteran political analyst Adam Boulton believes that Trump’s biggest threat may come from within his own administration, particularly from Vice President JD Vance, rather than from the Democratic opposition.

According to Boulton, Trump’s unpredictability as a leader may eventually hurt his standing. He wrote in The i that Republicans, including cabinet members, might decide that his relatively clean, family-oriented vice president is a better option to keep them in power if Trump turns into a more unpredictable liability, such as destroying the economy with tariffs or forcing America into an armed conflict with an ally.

The difficulties that Trump’s presidency faces
Trump has issued a number of executive orders since taking office again, some of which have caused unease among his most ardent supporters.

His administration has imposed tariffs on important allies like Canada and Mexico as part of its aggressive trade policies. Renaming the Gulf of Mexico, temporarily stopping aid to Ukraine, and starting the deportation of Venezuelans to El Salvador are just a few of his contentious foreign policy decisions. Reactions have also been triggered by his hostile tone toward Greenland, with some people fearing he plans to seize control of the island.

Trump’s inner circle is said to be uneasy as a result of his unpredictable choices and his past political and personal scandals. Some administration officials might see JD Vance as a more stable option as tensions rise.

The complex relationship between JD Vance and Trump
Trump was once the target of harsh criticism from Vance, a former venture capitalist and author of Hillbilly Elegy, who even called him “America’s Hitler.”

But as time went on, his opinions changed, and he now considers himself to be one of Trump’s closest supporters.

The Signal group scandal and the leaked messages sent to journalist Jeffrey Goldberg damaged JD Vance’s standing as one of Trump’s most reliable allies. Political analysts raised their eyebrows when Vance seemed to make subtle criticisms of Trump in the chats.

Vance asked whether the president understood the contradiction in his position, according to Goldberg, editor-in-chief of The Atlantic, who was unintentionally included in the discussion. Trump called for the United States to launch a unilateral attack on the Houthis in order to defend global shipping lanes, but he also insisted that European countries contribute more to such initiatives.

According to Goldberg, Vance wrote in the chat, “I don’t think the president realizes how contradictory this is with his message on Europe at the moment.”

JD Vance holds one of the most influential positions in the nation as vice president and may be eligible to assume the presidency if political conditions warrant it. Vance’s ideological consistency is questioned by some conservatives, while others view him as a practical option to lead the nation in the event that Trump falters.

His changing views on Trump raise questions about how he would lead if elected.

A tense nation
Trump’s stability is being questioned at a time when American democracy is being questioned. Political scientist Staffan Lindberg of V-Dem cautioned that “under President Trump, the USA now appears to be moving away from democracy.” I believe that this will have far-reaching effects on the entire world.

These worries were echoed by former Republican communications director Tara Setmayer, who told The Guardian: “A lot of people in the media and the opposition leadership don’t seem to be communicating that to the American people. We are approaching Defcon 1 for our democracy.” The normalization of it is the greatest threat of the current situation.

These worries have only grown as a result of some of Trump’s actions. A French scientist was allegedly denied entry to the United States in a widely publicized incident after border officials discovered anti-Trump text messages on his phone.

The researcher was refused entry “because the researcher’s phone contained exchanges with colleagues and friends in which he expressed a personal opinion on the Trump administration’s research policy,” according to France’s minister of higher education and research, who denounced the action.

What would it take to remove Trump from office?
Trump could be ousted in a number of ways if political tensions within the administration keep rising. Impeachment is the most well-known option; Trump avoided it twice during his first term.

The application of the 25th Amendment is an additional option. A majority of the cabinet and Vice President Vance could use this procedure to declare Trump “unable to discharge the powers and duties of his office.”

If Trump were to contest this ruling, Congress would have the authority to intervene. He would have to be removed from office permanently by a two-thirds majority in both the House and the Senate.

A third possibility is that political pressure will force Trump to resign, as was the case with President Richard Nixon during the Watergate affair. Even though it might seem unlikely, Trump’s capricious personality and the growing hostilities within his administration may cause Republicans to look for a different leader.

Would things be any different under a Vance presidency?
There is no assurance that JD Vance would steer the nation in a fundamentally different direction, even if he were to assume power. According to a number of experts, Vance has become so close to Trump that his presidency could just be a continuation of the current government.

Whatever happens in the upcoming months, one thing is certain: internal power struggles are a real possibility and the Trump White House is still as unpredictable as ever. JD Vance will be the center of attention as the administration comes under more scrutiny, whether as Trump’s devoted second-in-command or as a possible successor.