Viewers ‘Won’t Be Watching’ the Grammys Because of This Singer

Online backlash has been triggered by the Recording Academy’s announcement that a well-known singer will present at the 67th Grammy Awards. Some fans are pledging to boycott the event, while others are thrilled.

On February 2, 2025, the 67th Grammy Awards will be broadcast live on CBS and Paramount+. However, viewers have expressed their frustration after the Recording Academy confirmed Taylor Swift’s involvement in recent social media posts.

The singer will present during the show, the Recording Academy announced on January 30, 2025. Social media users responded negatively almost instantly, with many saying they were sick of seeing her.

“I’m not going to watch another show,” a Facebook user wrote. She watches football more than I can handle. Similar criticism was posted on X, where one user wrote, “I am outraged,” and another said, “Taylor Swift needs to be stopped.”

Some users were shocked and frustrated, saying things like, “Oh god who did this 😞,” and “We don’t want to see her.””Unfortunately,” one said bluntly, while another added, “I’m shocked.”

The singer’s fan base continues to support her strongly in spite of the criticism. As one Instagram fan wrote, “I’m sooooo excited 😭,” another added, “WE ARE SO READYYYY FOR IT 😍😍😍.” Other users expressed their excitement for her appearance.

There will be a full day of music celebrations at the 67th Grammy Awards. Many early winners will be revealed at the Premiere Ceremony, which kicks off the event at 3:30 PM ET/12:30 PM PT. Live streaming of this segment will be available on YouTube and LIVE.GRAMMY.COM.

The arrivals of nominees and notable figures in the industry will then be covered on Grammy Live From The Red Carpet, which airs at 6 PM ET/3 PM PT. YouTube, Facebook, TikTok, and LIVE.GRAMMY.COM will all carry the coverage.

The main event will stream on Paramount+ and air on CBS from 8 to 11:30 PM ET/5 to 8:30 PM PT. Additionally, the Recording Academy announced that first responders and those affected by the wildfires in Los Angeles will be honored at this year’s ceremony.

With six nominations this year, Swift—who is being criticized for her involvement in the event—remains a significant presence at the Grammys. Even though her presence as a presenter has sparked controversy, she is still anticipated to play a significant role in the evening, regardless of whether viewers decide to watch or not.

Internet users recently criticized the pop star for going to the first Chiefs game of 2025 to cheer on her boyfriend, a tight end.

Fans’ comments on Swift’s unusual walk caused a stir on the internet when she arrived at the Texans-Chiefs Playoff Game on January 18 and was seated next to basketball player Caitlin Clark.

Related Posts

At My Brother’s Wedding, His Bride Publicly Disrespected Me! But My 9-Year-Old Son Took the Mic and Changed Everything

A Son’s Toast That Silenced a Cruel Bride I’m Sarah Mitchell, a widowed single mother who has always been close to my younger brother, Daniel. When he…

BREAKING NEWS: Catastrophic Earthquake Devastates Central …see more

Numerous cities have been devastated by a strong earthquake that struck central Colombia. The most striking sight came from downtown Bogotá, where a multi-story apartment complex partially…

A Grocery Run, a Café, and a Shocking Truth: The Day I Found Out I Had a 53-Year-Old Son

Richard’s quick trip to pick up groceries ended up rewriting his past—and his future—within the span of a single evening. A Shock on the Sidewalk Turning onto…

Yes — the core facts check out. • **Amount & purpose:** Minnesota did pay roughly **\$430 000** in public money to the Washington-based law firm **K\&L Gates** to coach Gov. Tim Walz for a June 12, 2025 U.S. House Oversight Committee hearing on “sanctuary-city” policy. ([Star Tribune][1]) • **Timeframe & hourly rate:** Invoices the Star Tribune obtained cover work from **April 10 to June 12**; May charges alone came to about **\$232 000, averaging \$516 per hour**. ([Star Tribune][1]) • **Funding source:** The governor’s office tapped Minnesota’s **general fund** after getting approval from the Legislative Advisory Commission. ([Star Tribune][1]) • **Political reaction:** GOP legislators Jim Nash and Harry Niska called the spending excessive, while Walz’s staff blamed House Republicans for staging a “political stunt.” ([Star Tribune][1]) • **Comparable cases elsewhere:** Boston Mayor Michelle Wu (up to \$650 000), Denver Mayor Mike Johnston (≈ \$250 000) and others have used outside counsel for similar congressional-hearing prep. ([Star Tribune][1]) So the report that Gov. Walz’s office spent about \$430 000 of taxpayer money on outside lawyers to prepare for the sanctuary-city hearing—and the ensuing partisan flap—is accurate. [1]: https://www.startribune.com/walz-congressional-testimony-will-cost-minnesota-430k-in-legal-bills/601403334 “Walz’s congressional testimony will cost Minnesota $430K in legal bills”

Some folks pass through life quietly—minding their business, waving hello, keeping the peace. Others treat their cul-de-sac like a private fiefdom. Lindsey fell squarely into the second…

Minnesota Governor Walz Faces Backlash Over $430,000 Taxpayer Bill for Legal Prep

Minnesota Republicans are furious after learning that Governor Tim Walz used about $430,000 in state funds to hire outside lawyers ahead of a congressional hearing on sanctuary-city…

My Brother Was All I Had Left—So When She Tried to Kick Him Out, I Knew What I Had to Do

I’m Brandon, and at 28 my world flipped in a single phone call: a car crash took my parents, leaving me guardian to my 14-year-old brother, Liam….