Prince Harry makes royal history with big decision as legal document is leaked

To say it’s been a hectic few years for Prince Harry is a gross understatement. Once a steadfast bastion of support for his older brother, Prince William, as well as a beloved member of the British Royal Family, the Duke of Sussex’s outlook on life appeared to change drastically following his marriage to Meghan Markle.

Harry and Meghan have cut divisive figures in the public eye since their decision to step back from their royal duties. Though it must be said that they were well within their rights to opt for any and all of the decisions they made, their actions have been scrutinized and, on occasion, somewhat vilified in the press.

Whether or not you’re a fan of the Sussexes, at this point it’s impossible to refute the fact that they are compelling. And if you happen to a fan of Prince Harry’s you’ll want to read on below, as he’s reportedly made a historic move revealed to the public via leaked legal documents.

At one point in time it looked as though the bond between Princes William and Harry was about as ironclad as they come. The brothers were cruelly forced to grieve for their mother, the late Princess Diana, in plain view of the world, but through thick and thin they always had each other.

These days their relationship is shot through with fissures opened in no small part by Harry and Meghan Markle’s vocal criticism of the Royal Family since their move to relocate in the US.

The Sussexes’ infamous interview with Oprah Winfrey set the tone for the tension that was to come, and their candid Netflix series, later followed by Harry’s explosive memoir, Spare, made it clear in no uncertain terms that they were prepared to snipe at the British monarchy without much concern as to who was in the firing line.

Needless to say, the likes of King Charles, Queen Camilla, Prince William, and Kate Middleton, felt attacked by the many accusations consequently leveled. The result has been an uneasy standoff on either side of the Atlantic, with speculation insisting that Harry and Meghan are no longer trusted by the royal powers-that-be in Harry’s homeland.

For their part, it doesn’t much seem as though Harry and Meghan desire the affections of the establishment they left behind, though royal fans continue to hope that there might be a parlay of sorts in the future that at least dampens the fires of simmering animosity.

Next month Harry will return to the UK for the 10th anniversary of the Invictus Games, and certain reports have suggested that the occasion might be used to facilitate a reunion of sorts between he and his brother, William. The Royal Family are in the midst of an almost unprecedented health crisis remember, with King Charles and Kate Middleton both fighting respective cancer battles.

Yet those envisioning a future wherein Harry makes peace and returns to the royal fold might be left sorely disappointed, as a leaked legal document this week outlined how the Duke of Sussex has officially changed his country of residence to the US.

On the face of it, the move might not come as a shock to most given that Harry has called the country home for years now, but his decision does mark a historic milestone in both his personal and professional life.

The document in question shows a change effective from June 29, 2023, and states that Harry has shifted his home base from the United Kingdom to the United States of America. Up until now the UK was listed as his country of residence. No more.

More than a a mere legal formality, Harry’s official change of residency symbolizes a new chapter in the Prince’s life. For one, it signifies that he’s fully embracing the US alongside Meghan and the couple’s children, Prince Archie and Princess Lilibet.

The family have settled in a plush $14 million mansion in Montecito, California, and are now embarking upon a number of lucrative business ventures. Harry’s memoir, Spare, met with tremendous success upon its release, while the door remains open for whatever projects he and Meghan wish to take on, an obvious bonus of no longer being restricted to the rules and restrictions outlined by the Royal Family.

As for his connection with the monarchy, Harry has spoken previously about wishing to remain on good terms. With both sides reportedly wanting an apology from the other, however, the future is muddied with regards to how feasible a healthy working relationship might be moving forward.

What do you think about Harry’s decision to formally update his country of residence? Let us know in the comments.

If you like reading about the Royal Family and would like to see more from Newsner, check out the article below:

Related Posts

At My Brother’s Wedding, His Bride Publicly Disrespected Me! But My 9-Year-Old Son Took the Mic and Changed Everything

A Son’s Toast That Silenced a Cruel Bride I’m Sarah Mitchell, a widowed single mother who has always been close to my younger brother, Daniel. When he…

BREAKING NEWS: Catastrophic Earthquake Devastates Central …see more

Numerous cities have been devastated by a strong earthquake that struck central Colombia. The most striking sight came from downtown Bogotá, where a multi-story apartment complex partially…

A Grocery Run, a Café, and a Shocking Truth: The Day I Found Out I Had a 53-Year-Old Son

Richard’s quick trip to pick up groceries ended up rewriting his past—and his future—within the span of a single evening. A Shock on the Sidewalk Turning onto…

Yes — the core facts check out. • **Amount & purpose:** Minnesota did pay roughly **\$430 000** in public money to the Washington-based law firm **K\&L Gates** to coach Gov. Tim Walz for a June 12, 2025 U.S. House Oversight Committee hearing on “sanctuary-city” policy. ([Star Tribune][1]) • **Timeframe & hourly rate:** Invoices the Star Tribune obtained cover work from **April 10 to June 12**; May charges alone came to about **\$232 000, averaging \$516 per hour**. ([Star Tribune][1]) • **Funding source:** The governor’s office tapped Minnesota’s **general fund** after getting approval from the Legislative Advisory Commission. ([Star Tribune][1]) • **Political reaction:** GOP legislators Jim Nash and Harry Niska called the spending excessive, while Walz’s staff blamed House Republicans for staging a “political stunt.” ([Star Tribune][1]) • **Comparable cases elsewhere:** Boston Mayor Michelle Wu (up to \$650 000), Denver Mayor Mike Johnston (≈ \$250 000) and others have used outside counsel for similar congressional-hearing prep. ([Star Tribune][1]) So the report that Gov. Walz’s office spent about \$430 000 of taxpayer money on outside lawyers to prepare for the sanctuary-city hearing—and the ensuing partisan flap—is accurate. [1]: https://www.startribune.com/walz-congressional-testimony-will-cost-minnesota-430k-in-legal-bills/601403334 “Walz’s congressional testimony will cost Minnesota $430K in legal bills”

Some folks pass through life quietly—minding their business, waving hello, keeping the peace. Others treat their cul-de-sac like a private fiefdom. Lindsey fell squarely into the second…

Minnesota Governor Walz Faces Backlash Over $430,000 Taxpayer Bill for Legal Prep

Minnesota Republicans are furious after learning that Governor Tim Walz used about $430,000 in state funds to hire outside lawyers ahead of a congressional hearing on sanctuary-city…

My Brother Was All I Had Left—So When She Tried to Kick Him Out, I Knew What I Had to Do

I’m Brandon, and at 28 my world flipped in a single phone call: a car crash took my parents, leaving me guardian to my 14-year-old brother, Liam….