Donald Trump’s hot mic reveals what he said to Justice Roberts

The news cycle today is spinning faster than ever, dominated by the constant developments surrounding the new Republican administration led by President Donald Trump. With the administration in full swing, public interest in every move and statement made by political leaders has intensified, leading to widespread discussion and speculation. One of the latest topics that has drawn significant attention was an interaction between President Trump and Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts, which has now been clarified by the President himself.

In recent weeks, President Donald Trump has faced scrutiny, as is typical for any sitting president. Every word he speaks and every action he takes are analyzed closely by the media and the public. Before delivering a speech to Congress, Trump was caught on camera exchanging words with Chief Justice John Roberts. The interaction immediately sparked speculation, with many wondering about the nature of the exchange and what exactly Trump had meant by his words.

Earlier this week, Trump delivered an address to Congress in which he discussed various topics, including U.S. relations with Russia and Ukraine. He mentioned Russian President Vladimir Putin and the “strong signals” he had given the United States in pursuit of peace. Additionally, he referenced a letter from Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky, in which the Ukrainian leader expressed his willingness to negotiate peace and sign a minerals agreement with the U.S. whenever it was convenient.

While the speech itself made headlines, it was the moment before his remarks that raised the most questions. As Trump walked past the Supreme Court Justices on his way to the podium, cameras captured him saying “thank you” to Chief Justice John Roberts. This brief exchange ignited a wave of speculation, with theories circulating about the possible reasons behind Trump’s gratitude.

Before speculation could gain further traction, Trump decided to address the matter directly. Taking to his social media platform, Truth Social, he dismissed the rumors and provided a clear explanation.

“The Fake ‘Play the Ref’ News, in order to create a divide between me and our great U.S. Supreme Court, heard me say last night, loudly and openly as I was walking past the Justices on the way to the podium, ‘thank you’ to Chief Justice John Roberts,” Trump wrote.

He continued, “Like most people, I don’t watch Fake News CNN or MSDNC, but I understand they are going ‘crazy’ asking what is it that I was thanking Justice Roberts for?”

Trump then elaborated, “They never called my office to ask, of course, but if they had I would have told these sleazebag ‘journalists’ that I thanked him for SWEARING ME IN ON INAUGURATION DAY, AND DOING A REALLY GOOD JOB IN SO DOING! The Fake News never quits!”

With this statement, Trump dismissed any notion of a deeper or more controversial meaning behind the interaction. He made it clear that his gratitude was directed at Roberts for administering the oath of office during his inauguration.

Beyond this clarification, the content of Trump’s address to Congress placed significant focus on the war in Ukraine. This emphasis followed a recent Oval Office meeting with Zelensky, during which Trump allegedly warned the Ukrainian leader that he was “gambling with World War 3.”

In his speech, Trump reiterated the contents of the letter from Zelensky, highlighting Ukraine’s stated commitment to negotiating peace. “The letter reads Ukraine is ready to come to the negotiating table as soon as possible to bring lasting peace closer,” Trump stated.

He further quoted the letter: “Nobody wants peace more than the Ukrainians. Regarding the agreement on minerals and security, Ukraine is ready to sign it at any time that is convenient for you.”

This statement underscored Trump’s diplomatic approach and his willingness to engage in negotiations that could shape the future of the conflict.

In the fast-moving world of politics, moments like these can quickly become the subject of intense speculation. However, Trump’s swift response appears to have put any doubts to rest. What began as a simple exchange of gratitude between the President and the Chief Justice evolved into yet another instance of media scrutiny and public debate. Now that Trump has clarified the situation, the speculation surrounding his interaction with Roberts has been largely dispelled.

As the Trump administration continues to navigate its second term, the scrutiny surrounding the President’s actions will likely persist. Every public appearance, speech, and policy decision will remain under the media’s microscope. Whether one agrees or disagrees with Trump’s leadership, it is clear that he remains a central figure in American politics, shaping discussions both domestically and internationally.

With this latest incident addressed, attention now turns to the administration’s next steps. Trump’s remarks on Ukraine, Russia, and international negotiations suggest that his foreign policy agenda is taking shape. Whether his strategies will be effective in securing peace and advancing American interests remains to be seen.

What do you think about Trump’s clarification? Share your thoughts and join the conversation.

Related Posts

Yes — the core facts check out. • **Amount & purpose:** Minnesota did pay roughly **\$430 000** in public money to the Washington-based law firm **K\&L Gates** to coach Gov. Tim Walz for a June 12, 2025 U.S. House Oversight Committee hearing on “sanctuary-city” policy. ([Star Tribune][1]) • **Timeframe & hourly rate:** Invoices the Star Tribune obtained cover work from **April 10 to June 12**; May charges alone came to about **\$232 000, averaging \$516 per hour**. ([Star Tribune][1]) • **Funding source:** The governor’s office tapped Minnesota’s **general fund** after getting approval from the Legislative Advisory Commission. ([Star Tribune][1]) • **Political reaction:** GOP legislators Jim Nash and Harry Niska called the spending excessive, while Walz’s staff blamed House Republicans for staging a “political stunt.” ([Star Tribune][1]) • **Comparable cases elsewhere:** Boston Mayor Michelle Wu (up to \$650 000), Denver Mayor Mike Johnston (≈ \$250 000) and others have used outside counsel for similar congressional-hearing prep. ([Star Tribune][1]) So the report that Gov. Walz’s office spent about \$430 000 of taxpayer money on outside lawyers to prepare for the sanctuary-city hearing—and the ensuing partisan flap—is accurate. [1]: https://www.startribune.com/walz-congressional-testimony-will-cost-minnesota-430k-in-legal-bills/601403334 “Walz’s congressional testimony will cost Minnesota $430K in legal bills”

Some folks pass through life quietly—minding their business, waving hello, keeping the peace. Others treat their cul-de-sac like a private fiefdom. Lindsey fell squarely into the second…

Minnesota Governor Walz Faces Backlash Over $430,000 Taxpayer Bill for Legal Prep

Minnesota Republicans are furious after learning that Governor Tim Walz used about $430,000 in state funds to hire outside lawyers ahead of a congressional hearing on sanctuary-city…

My Brother Was All I Had Left—So When She Tried to Kick Him Out, I Knew What I Had to Do

I’m Brandon, and at 28 my world flipped in a single phone call: a car crash took my parents, leaving me guardian to my 14-year-old brother, Liam….

A girl was selling her deceased mother’s belongings at the market. One day, an expensive car pulled up nearby.

For ten years Maxim had been haunted by the same nightmare: Valentina’s furious words— “I hate you. Stay away from me!”— echoed in his sleep and left…

My Neighbor Kept Hanging Her Panties Right Outside My Son’s Window — So I Decided to Teach Her a Real Lesson

  When Underwear Takes Flight: The Day I Declared War on My Neighbor’s Laundry Living in suburbia, you expect to deal with the usual neighborly quirks—barking dogs,…

Quick-Thinking Couple Honk Their Way To Heroism During Texas Flood

A Minnesota couple’s fast thinking proved to be a lifesaver when they assisted in warning other campers of the devastating flash floods that were sweeping through central…